Klyra Autofill vs Anything API
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Anything API leads with 672 upvotes
Save a token once. Swagger Authorize fills itself.
Klyra Autofill is a streamlined browser extension designed to simplify the process of filling out Swagger Authorize prompts, API documentation, and matching fields using saved tokens. Tailored for developers and API testers, it offers a secure and efficient way to manage multiple site profiles without mixing local and production environments. Values remain stored within the browser, ensuring privacy and quick access across different pages via an intuitive popup, keyboard shortcut (Cmd+Shift+Y), or right-click menu. Its core strength lies in saving a token once, then automating the authorization process, significantly reducing repetitive manual input and speeding up development workflows. The tool's focus on privacy, with local storage of values and distinct profiles for each site, makes it a reliable companion for API development and testing tasks.
Pros
- Automates Swagger Authorize and API form filling, saving time
- Supports multiple site profiles for better organization
- Values are stored locally in browser for privacy and security
- Easy to access via popup, keyboard shortcut, or right-click
- Designed specifically for developers and API testers
Cons
- Limited information available about advanced customization options
- User interface details and ease of use are not extensively documented
- No clear information on free vs. paid tiers or subscription plans
Best for
- • Automatically filling Swagger API authorization tokens during testing
- • Managing multiple API environments without cross-contamination
- • Speeding up repetitive API request setups in development
- • Storing and auto-filling tokens for different client sites
Pricing: Pricing not verified
Any website. We deliver the API.
Anything API is an innovative platform that bridges the gap for websites lacking public APIs. It empowers users to convert their browser-based interactions into robust, production-ready APIs without extensive coding. By simply describing the task, users can have custom functions built that directly call the target website, enabling seamless integration and automation. These custom API endpoints can be deployed serverless, scheduled via Cron, or accessed through standard API calls, making it highly versatile for developers, automation enthusiasts, and businesses seeking to extend functionality of web services. Its unique approach of translating manual browser work into programmable endpoints distinguishes it from traditional API providers, offering a flexible solution for accessing data or automating tasks on virtually any website.
Pros
- Transforms any website into a custom API without coding
- Flexible deployment options including serverless and scheduled tasks
- User-friendly task description process simplifies API creation
- Supports automation and integration with existing systems
- Highly versatile for various web scraping and data extraction needs
Cons
- Limited details on pricing structure and plans
- Potential challenges with highly dynamic or complex websites
- Reliance on agent-generated functions may require occasional updates
Best for
- • Extracting data from websites lacking public APIs
- • Automating repetitive browser tasks through API calls
- • Building integrations for custom web workflows
- • Monitoring website changes or content updates
Pricing: Likely operates on a pay-as-you-go or subscription-based model, with possible tiered plans depending on usage volume and features. Specific pricing details are not publicly disclosed, suggesting a custom or variable pricing approach.