tunnl.gg vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Stable localhost URLs over SSH with no installs
tunnl.gg is a developer-focused tool that simplifies exposing local servers over the internet via stable SSH tunnels. Unlike traditional tunneling solutions that assign ephemeral URLs, tunnl.gg provides a consistent public URL by authenticating through SSH using a dedicated username and key. This approach makes it ideal for developers and teams who need reliable, persistent endpoints for webhook integrations, testing, or development workflows without the hassle of constantly updating URLs. Its zero-installation setup and open-source server make it accessible and easy to deploy, while features like a live request log, QR code, and request inspector enhance usability and debugging. With a free tier and optional pro features such as custom subdomains, tunnl.gg appeals to both individual developers and organizations seeking a secure, stable, and straightforward solution for exposing local services over HTTPS.
Pros
- Provides a consistent, stable URL for local servers over SSH
- No installation required; works on any machine with SSH
- Open-source server ensures transparency and customization
- User-friendly features like QR code and live request logs
- Free tier available with optional premium features
Cons
- Limited to users familiar with SSH and command-line tools
- Pro features may require additional setup or configuration
- No detailed pricing information provided
Best for
- • Exposing local development servers for testing webhooks or APIs
- • Sharing local projects securely with clients or team members
- • Consistent URLs for CI/CD pipelines and automation
- • Debugging webhooks and callback endpoints in real-time
Pricing: Pricing not verified
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.