SCMD vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Manage what Claude Remembers and Keeps as Memory.
SCMD is an open-source, privacy-focused tool designed specifically for managing the persistent memories that Claude, an AI assistant, saves about users and their projects. It provides a local review deck where users can keep, delete, skip, undo, rewrite, and inspect why a particular memory was stored. This ensures users maintain control over their data, with decisions staying staged until explicitly confirmed, and deleted memories moving to a restorable trash. Its zero dependencies and cloud-free architecture make it an appealing choice for developers and privacy-conscious users who want an offline solution. Designed with transparency and user control in mind, SCMD is ideal for those working with AI memory management, especially in development or research environments. Its open-source MIT license encourages contributions, making it a flexible and community-driven project that emphasizes security and user sovereignty.
Pros
- Open-source with MIT license, encouraging community contributions
- Local, privacy-focused solution with no telemetry or cloud dependencies
- Simple command-line interface with easy run options (/scmd:run or npx)
- Full control over memory management: keep, delete, undo, rewrite, inspect
- Restorable trash system for deleted memories
Cons
- Limited to Claude-related memory management, may not suit broader AI memory needs
- Requires familiarity with command-line operations
- No built-in GUI, which might be less user-friendly for some users
Best for
- • Managing persistent memories in AI development projects using Claude
- • Ensuring data privacy by locally reviewing and controlling AI memories
- • Experimenting with AI memory retention and deletion workflows
- • Developers contributing to or customizing AI memory management tools
Pricing: Pricing not verified
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.