Permit MCP Gateway vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Drop-in MCP Security Developers Love and CISOs Trust
Permit MCP Gateway is a zero-trust security proxy designed to enhance the security and governance of MCP (Meta Cloud Platform) integrations. It seamlessly adds advanced authentication, authorization, and consent management to any MCP server without requiring modifications to existing code or the installation of SDKs or agents. By simply swapping a URL, developers can enable OAuth authentication, Zanzibar-style fine-grained authorization, comprehensive consent screens, and detailed decision logging. This makes it ideal for organizations seeking to secure AI agent connections while maintaining ease of deployment. Its compatibility with any MCP server and focus on augmenting security features make it a compelling choice for developers, security teams, and CISOs looking for a robust, low-overhead security layer.
Pros
- No SDKs or agents required — easy deployment with URL swap
- Adds comprehensive security features including OAuth, Zanzibar-style authorization, and consent screens
- Works with any MCP server, ensuring broad compatibility
- Full decision logging enhances auditability and compliance
- Enhances zero-trust security without modifying existing infrastructure
Cons
- Limited built-in authorization capabilities; relies on external systems for detailed governance
- No connection to existing IdP infrastructure, which may require additional integration efforts
- Potential complexity in configuring Zanzibar-style authorization for advanced use cases
Best for
- • Securing AI agent connections in enterprise MCP environments
- • Implementing zero-trust security for internal developer tools
- • Adding fine-grained access control and consent flows to existing MCP-based applications
- • Ensuring auditability and compliance through detailed decision logging
Pricing: Likely operates on a subscription or usage-based pricing model, given its role as a security proxy service. Specific pricing details are not publicly available, but it may offer tiered plans based on volume or feature access.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.