MCP-Billing vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
OAuth 2.1 + usage-based Stripe billing for MCP servers
MCP-Billing is a comprehensive, self-hosted boilerplate designed for developers building secure, scalable APIs and server-based applications. It integrates full OAuth 2.1 with PKCE for robust authentication, API key management with zero-downtime rotation, and usage-based billing powered by Stripe. Its modular architecture includes 7 core modules and over 300 tests, ensuring reliability and flexibility for different project needs. The open-source metering core available on npm allows for transparent customization and integration, while the included Stripe billing simplifies monetization strategies for SaaS providers. Suitable for teams seeking a secure, customizable foundation, MCP-Billing offers a one-time purchase model with no revenue sharing or platform lock-in, making it an attractive choice for long-term projects that require control and scalability.
Pros
- Complete self-hosted solution with robust security features
- Integration of OAuth 2.1 + PKCE for secure authentication
- Usage-based billing with Stripe, flexible and developer-friendly
- Open-source metering core on npm for transparency and customization
- One-time purchase with no revenue sharing or lock-in
Cons
- Primarily targeted at experienced developers comfortable with self-hosting
- Requires setup and maintenance of hosting environment
- Limited information on ongoing support or updates post-purchase
Best for
- • Building secure API services with integrated billing
- • Developing SaaS platforms requiring usage-based monetization
- • Creating custom authentication systems with OAuth 2.1
- • Implementing rate limiting and API key management for high-volume applications
Pricing: MCP-Billing is sold as a one-time purchase for €79, with the core metering component being free and open source. There are no recurring fees or revenue sharing, but users must host and maintain the system themselves.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.