Knock vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Knock on your MacBook to control your Mac
Knock is an innovative Mac utility that leverages the built-in accelerometer in Apple Silicon MacBooks to turn physical taps or knocks into instant, customizable actions. Designed for productivity enthusiasts and power users, it transforms simple physical gestures into commands like switching tabs, changing desktops, controlling music playback, opening apps, or running scripts. Unlike traditional keyboard shortcuts, Knock offers a more intuitive and tactile way to interact with your Mac, making multitasking quicker and more seamless. Its unique use of hardware sensors sets it apart, allowing users to perform actions with a natural, physical gesture on the MacBook's chassis or nearby surface, without interrupting their workflow.
Pros
- Utilizes built-in accelerometer for innovative gesture controls
- Highly customizable shortcuts and actions
- No additional hardware required beyond the MacBook
- Enhances productivity with quick, physical gestures
- Easy to set up and use
Cons
- Limited to Apple Silicon MacBooks with accelerometers
- Requires precise knocking to trigger actions, which may need adjustment
- Potential false triggers if knocking is inconsistent
Best for
- • Switching between open tabs or desktops with a tap
- • Controlling music playback during work or workouts
- • Opening frequently used apps with a simple knock
- • Running custom scripts for automation tasks
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model with basic features available for free and premium features or customization options offered via paid plans, typically starting around $5-$10/month.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.