Kastra vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Runtime authorization for Claude, Cursor, Codex and OpenClaw
Kastra is an innovative runtime authorization layer designed specifically for AI agents and tools like Claude, Cursor, Codex, and OpenClaw. It acts as a security gatekeeper, determining what actions AI agents can perform before they execute, ensuring compliance with policies and reducing the risk of misuse. With sub-1 millisecond latency, Kastra seamlessly integrates with various SDKs and tools, providing a centralized control plane to manage permissions across multiple AI environments. This makes it ideal for organizations seeking to enforce strict security and operational policies without compromising performance. Its ability to prevent unauthorized tool usage, prompt injections, and data leaks before they occur sets it apart, emphasizing trust in rules rather than the agents themselves. Kastra empowers developers and security teams to maintain control over AI interactions while supporting the agility required for modern AI deployments.
Pros
- Extremely low latency (<1 ms) for real-time authorization
- Supports multiple AI tools and SDKs through a unified control plane
- Enhances security by preventing unauthorized actions and data leaks
- Easy to integrate into existing AI workflows and architectures
- Enforces policies before actions are executed, reducing risk
Cons
- Limited public information on pricing and deployment scale
- Potential complexity in managing policies for large-scale deployments
- Requires integration effort for existing AI systems
Best for
- • Preventing unauthorized use of proprietary AI models in enterprise settings
- • Mitigating prompt injection attacks in sensitive AI applications
- • Controlling access to external tools and APIs via AI agents
- • Ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations during AI interactions
Pricing: Details are not explicitly provided, but likely follows a SaaS subscription model with tiered plans based on usage, number of agents, or enterprise features. A free trial or freemium tier may be available for initial testing.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.