Inspector vs Lyba: The client review layer for Framer
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes

Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.

Client approval for Framer sites — without the email chain.
Lyba is a native Framer plugin designed to streamline the client review process for web designers and developers. By adding a dedicated review layer directly onto Framer projects, Lyba eliminates the chaotic email chains and scattered feedback commonly associated with client approvals. Clients can easily share a review link, pin comments directly on the live site, and provide timestamped sign-offs, making the feedback loop more organized and efficient. This tool is ideal for teams looking to enhance their collaboration, reduce misunderstandings, and accelerate approval timelines without leaving the Framer environment. Its seamless integration within Framer makes it a unique solution for those already invested in the platform, offering a native, frictionless experience that keeps all review activity centralized.
Pros
- Native Framer integration for seamless workflow
- Allows clients to pin comments directly on the live site
- Provides timestamped approvals for clear tracking
- Reduces email clutter and miscommunication
- User-friendly sharing and review process
Cons
- Limited to Framer users, not a standalone review platform
- Features might be basic for complex review needs
- No clear information on pricing tiers or free plan
Best for
- • Design teams seeking efficient client feedback on web prototypes
- • Agencies managing multiple client projects within Framer
- • Freelancers looking for a streamlined review process
- • Teams aiming to reduce feedback email clutter
Pricing: Likely uses a subscription-based model integrated with Framer, possibly offering a free trial or tier, with paid plans starting around a modest monthly fee. Exact pricing details are not publicly specified.