ilha vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes

Your Claude Code and Codex limits, live in the notch
ilha is a sleek native Mac application designed for developers and AI enthusiasts who work with Claude Code, Codex, and Grok Build APIs. Sitting discreetly in the Mac's notch area, it provides real-time visualizations of your API usage limits across different timeframes—daily, weekly, and reset times—helping users stay on top of their quotas without distraction. Its seamless integration allows users managing multiple accounts to switch the CLI to a more available limit without logging out, enhancing workflow efficiency. Additionally, ilha offers insights pricing based on weekly API usage, tailored per project, giving teams clear visibility into their costs and consumption patterns. Its unobtrusive design and focus on limit monitoring make it an invaluable tool for developers relying on these APIs in their daily work.
Pros
- Discreet Mac app that lives in the notch for quick glanceability
- Real-time updates on API usage and limit status
- Supports multiple accounts and seamless CLI switching
- Provides insights pricing tailored to usage and projects
- Easy to use with minimal setup, ideal for developers
Cons
- Limited to Mac users, not cross-platform
- Focuses primarily on usage monitoring, not broader API management
- Features may be basic for advanced users needing deeper analytics
Best for
- • Monitoring Claude Code, Codex, and Grok Build API limits during development
- • Managing multiple API accounts efficiently
- • Preventing unexpected API quota exhaustion during intensive projects
- • Tracking usage patterns over time for cost optimization
Pricing: Pricing not verified

Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.