Gretl vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Visual control pannel for localhosts
Gretl is a developer-focused port management tool that simplifies monitoring and controlling local servers and services. Designed to sit in the menu bar, it offers real-time visibility into all active ports on a developer's machine, allowing users to easily name, group, start, stop, and share these processes. Its intuitive interface and integration capabilities make it ideal for developers juggling multiple local projects, ensuring they always know what’s running on each port. Gretl stands out by providing both standalone functionality and seamless integration with existing workflows through a CLI, SDKs for Python, Ruby, and Node.js, and a customizable gr.toml configuration file. This flexibility fosters collaboration among teams, enabling consistent setup across development environments. Whether used solo or with a team, Gretl streamlines local development, reduces debugging time, and enhances productivity, especially in complex projects with numerous microservices or APIs running concurrently.
Pros
- Real-time port monitoring with easy management features
- Supports multiple scripting languages and CLI for automation
- Team-friendly with configuration sharing via gr.toml
- Lightweight and sits conveniently in the menu bar
- Enhances productivity by reducing port-related confusion
Cons
- Limited to local environment management, not suitable for production servers
- No built-in advanced analytics or logging features
- Voters and user base appear small, indicating potential limited community support
Best for
- • Managing multiple local microservices during development
- • Sharing port configurations across team members
- • Quickly identifying which process is running on a specific port
- • Automating port management tasks via CLI or SDKs
Pricing: Likely offers a freemium model with core features available for free, possibly with paid plans for advanced integrations or team management features. Exact pricing details are not specified, but it aims to be accessible for individual developers and teams.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.