Gboard Kurukuru Version vs 1Code
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 1Code leads with 598 upvotes
Your fingers stay put. The keys come around
Gboard Kurukuru Version is an innovative conveyor belt keyboard designed by Google Japan's Gboard team. Unlike traditional keyboards, it features four rotating belts, each carrying 29 keys, that pass characters past your fingers in a continuous loop. This unique design allows users to reach every character with just one hand, making it ideal for ergonomic typing and rapid input. As a DIY project, it is not available for sale but offers STL files, firmware, and a comprehensive build guide on GitHub, making it accessible for hobbyists and custom keyboard enthusiasts. Its distinctive conveyor belt mechanism and open-source approach set it apart, appealing to those interested in hardware hacking, custom configurations, or crafting their own ergonomic input devices.
Pros
- Innovative conveyor belt design enables one-handed operation
- Open-source resources facilitate customization and DIY assembly
- Allows for a highly personalized keyboard setup
- Encourages engagement with hardware hacking and electronics
Cons
- Requires technical skills to build and assemble
- Not commercially available for immediate purchase
- Potentially complex setup for beginners
Best for
- • DIY enthusiasts building custom ergonomic keyboards
- • Individuals seeking one-handed input solutions
- • Hardware hackers experimenting with conveyor belt mechanisms
- • Users interested in open-source keyboard projects
Pricing: Pricing not verified
Open source Cursor-like UI for Claude Code
1Code is an innovative open source UI tool designed for developers working with Claude Code, an AI coding assistant. It offers a Cursor-like interface that enables users to run multiple Claude Code agents simultaneously, significantly accelerating feature development and testing. Available on Mac and Web, 1Code provides the flexibility to run locally or remotely, with live previews for mobile and desktop, making it easy to monitor agents from anywhere. Its parallel execution capability is particularly beneficial for teams seeking to streamline AI-driven coding workflows, enabling faster iteration and more efficient collaboration. The tool's user-friendly interface and cross-platform support make it an appealing choice for AI developers, coding enthusiasts, and teams integrating Claude Code into their development stacks.
Pros
- Supports parallel execution of multiple Claude Code agents, boosting productivity
- Cross-platform compatibility: works on Mac and Web with live preview features
- Open source, allowing for customization and community-driven improvements
- User-friendly, Cursor-like UI simplifies managing multiple agents
- Enables remote monitoring and testing, including mobile previews
Cons
- Primarily focused on Claude Code, limiting versatility with other AI models
- May require some technical expertise to set up and customize
- Limited detailed documentation available for advanced features
Best for
- • Parallel testing and debugging of AI coding agents
- • Accelerating feature development with multiple Claude Code instances
- • Remote monitoring of AI agents during development on multiple devices
- • Integrating AI code assistants into local and cloud-based workflows
Pricing: Likely free and open source, offering users the ability to customize and deploy without licensing costs. Additional features or enterprise support may be available through community or third-party services.