fort vs qsa.sh
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 qsa.sh leads with 111 upvotes
One command to audit and fix your Mac's security
fort is a lightweight, agentless Mac security tool designed for developers and teams seeking quick, comprehensive security audits without the overhead of traditional MDM solutions. With a single command, it scans over 15 critical security settings including FileVault, SIP, firewall, Gatekeeper, SSH, AirDrop, and more, providing an overall security score and automatically fixing most issues. Its minimalistic approach, being a single binary with no telemetry, makes it ideal for individuals and organizations aiming to harden Macs efficiently—especially when preparing for compliance standards like SOC 2 or ISO 27001. Fort’s simplicity, combined with its open-source license (MIT), ensures transparency and ease of use, making it a standout in the Mac security space.
Pros
- Agentless design eliminates the need for MDM or signups
- Automatic fixing of common security issues saves time
- Lightweight with a single binary, easy to install via Homebrew
- No telemetry ensures user privacy and transparency
- Open-source license promotes trust and customization
Cons
- Limited to Mac, not suitable for cross-platform environments
- Focuses on basic security settings, may not cover advanced threats
- Lacks a GUI, requiring command-line familiarity
Best for
- • Developers hardening their own Macs for secure coding environments
- • Teams preparing for security audits like SOC 2 or ISO 27001 without MDM overhead
- • IT professionals conducting quick security assessments across multiple Macs
- • Individuals seeking an easy way to verify and improve their Mac security
Pricing: Likely free and open-source under the MIT license, with installation via Homebrew; no subscription or paid plans mentioned.
External security scan of your own IP, in your terminal
qsa.sh is a powerful command-line tool designed for developers and security professionals to perform quick, comprehensive external security scans of their own servers. With a single curl command, users can instantly see what the internet perceives about their server—covering open ports, service versions, and known vulnerabilities—delivered directly to their terminal within approximately 30 seconds. Its integration of tools like naabu, nmap, vulners, and nuclei ensures a detailed mapping of potential security gaps without requiring any accounts or data storage. The platform caters to both free, live scans and premium options like the Pro plan, which scans all 65,535 ports asynchronously, and a one-time Deep scan that digs deeper into hidden vulnerabilities via email. Its straightforward approach makes it ideal for sysadmins, security teams, and developers seeking a quick, transparent security overview of their infrastructure.
Pros
- Instant, real-time security insights delivered directly in the terminal
- No account required and no data storage, ensuring privacy
- Combines multiple scanning tools for comprehensive vulnerability detection
- Flexible plans including free, Pro, and deep scans for different needs
- Fast scan times (~30 seconds) suitable for routine checks
Cons
- Limited depth in the free scan compared to paid options
- Requires command-line familiarity, which may be intimidating for non-technical users
- Potential false positives or overlooked vulnerabilities in quick scans
Best for
- • Quickly auditing server security before deployment
- • Regular external vulnerability checks for ongoing security posture
- • Preliminary scans prior to detailed penetration testing
- • Monitoring open ports and services on cloud or on-premise servers
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model with free live scans and paid plans offering more comprehensive, asynchronous, or one-time deep scans. Exact pricing details are not specified, but premium features probably start around a monthly fee.