Deconflict vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Plan your WiFi and see through walls
Deconflict is a free, open-source WiFi planning tool that runs directly in your browser, making network design accessible without any installation or account requirements. It allows users to upload floorplans, select from over 100 real-world access point models, and visualize signal coverage in real-time. What sets Deconflict apart is its ability to accurately simulate RF signal propagation through various wall materials such as glass, brick, and concrete, each with realistic attenuation effects. Its automatic channel assignment and a sophisticated 3-stage optimizer help identify the optimal placement of access points, ensuring robust and reliable WiFi coverage. Designed for network engineers, DIY enthusiasts, and developers, Deconflict offers a powerful yet user-friendly way to plan and troubleshoot WiFi deployments with precision. Its open-source nature encourages community engagement and customization, making it a standout tool in the WiFi planning landscape.
Pros
- Free and open-source, no account or installation needed
- Realistic RF propagation simulation through different wall materials
- Automatic channel assignment and optimization for effective placement
- Supports a wide range of real-world access point models
- User-friendly browser-based interface suitable for various skill levels
Cons
- Limited to WiFi planning, not a comprehensive network management tool
- May require some familiarity with floorplans and network concepts
- Feature set might be basic compared to enterprise solutions
Best for
- • Planning WiFi coverage for new commercial or residential buildings
- • Optimizing access point placement in existing networks
- • Educational purposes for teaching wireless networking concepts
- • DIY home network design and troubleshooting
Pricing: Deconflict is free and open source, making it accessible for personal, educational, and small-scale professional use without any subscription costs.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.