Clicker: TV Remote vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
π Inspector leads with 621 upvotes

The TV remote app that doesn't sell your living room
Clicker: TV Remote transforms an iPhone into a universal remote control compatible with popular streaming devices and smart TVs, including Roku, Fire TV, Google TV, Samsung, LG, Sony, TCL, Hisense, and Vizio. Its user-friendly interface provides a full D-pad, volume controls, playback options, and a real keyboard for easy searching, making it a versatile solution for navigating entertainment systems without multiple remotes. What sets Clicker apart is its commitment to privacyβno ads, no tracking, and no subscription fees, offering a secure experience. For those seeking added features, a one-time purchase of $9.99 unlocks the Pro version, delivering enhanced functionality without ongoing costs or intrusive data collection.
Pros
- Universal compatibility with major streaming devices and smart TVs
- No ads, no tracking, and no ongoing subscription fees for basic use
- Includes a full keyboard for search functions, improving usability
- One-time purchase option for advanced features with the Pro version
- Easy-to-use interface suitable for all ages
Cons
- Limited information on advanced features available in Pro
- No information on Bluetooth or Wi-Fi connection requirements
- ProductHunt votes are currently at zero, indicating limited user feedback
Best for
- β’ Replacing multiple physical remotes with a single iPhone app
- β’ Quickly searching for content across streaming platforms
- β’ Controlling multiple smart TVs and streaming devices in a household
- β’ Using the keyboard for easier text input during searches
Pricing: Pricing not verified

Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- β’ Quick UI tweaks during product development
- β’ Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- β’ Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- β’ Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.