CleanDevMac vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Find and delete the dev caches eating your Mac's disk
CleanDevMac (cdm) is an open-source command-line tool designed specifically for macOS developers seeking to reclaim disk space by cleaning up redundant cache files, build artifacts, Electron junk, and orphaned app data. Built entirely with bash, it emphasizes transparency by showing users a detailed list of items before any deletion, ensuring safe and informed cleanup. Its open-source MIT license guarantees no telemetry or data collection, making it a privacy-conscious choice for developers who prefer control over their system maintenance. Ideal for developers, power users, and Mac enthusiasts, cdm streamlines disk management by targeting common space hogs created during software development and app usage. Its CLI nature makes it lightweight, fast, and easily integrable into existing workflows, making it a practical addition for those who want an efficient, no-nonsense cleanup tool.
Pros
- Open-source and free, ensuring transparency and community-driven development
- Never deletes without user confirmation, reducing risk of accidental data loss
- Lightweight and pure bash implementation for easy customization and speed
- Targets various cache types including developer caches, build artifacts, and Electron junk
- No telemetry or data collection, prioritizing user privacy
Cons
- Limited to macOS, not cross-platform
- Requires command-line familiarity; not suitable for non-technical users
- May need manual setup or scripting for automation
Best for
- • Developers cleaning up build artifacts and caches after project completion
- • Mac users reclaiming disk space from Electron-based app junk
- • Maintainers removing orphaned app data to improve system performance
- • Power users integrating cleanup routines into their development workflows
Pricing: Free and open source under the MIT license, with no paid tiers or subscription fees.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.