Cerberus vs Inspector
Side-by-side comparison of features, pros & cons, pricing, and community votes (2026).
🏆 Inspector leads with 621 upvotes
Keep Grafana®. Swap the backend.
Cerberus is an innovative open-source gateway designed to enhance the flexibility of monitoring and observability stacks, specifically tailored for Grafana users. It allows seamless swapping of backend data sources like Prometheus, Loki, and Tempo with ClickHouse, providing a more scalable and performant alternative without sacrificing existing dashboards, alerting mechanisms, or CLI tooling. This makes it an ideal choice for developers and DevOps teams seeking to modernize their telemetry infrastructure while maintaining their familiar visualization environment. What sets Cerberus apart is its drop-in compatibility, enabling users to transition to ClickHouse effortlessly and leverage its high-speed querying capabilities and efficient data storage. Its open architecture ensures that teams can tailor their setup to meet evolving demands without overhauling their entire observability stack.
Pros
- Enables seamless backend replacement without disrupting existing Grafana setups
- Open-source, customizable, and flexible for various telemetry data sources
- Improves query performance and scalability with ClickHouse backend
- Retains existing alerting, dashboards, and CLI tools, reducing migration overhead
Cons
- Relatively new tool with a smaller community and ecosystem
- Requires familiarity with ClickHouse and backend configuration
- Potential compatibility issues with complex or custom Grafana setups
Best for
- • Replacing Prometheus backend for improved scalability in large environments
- • Migrating from Loki to ClickHouse for more efficient log querying
- • Switching Tempo backend to enhance trace data processing performance
- • Modernizing observability stacks without redesigning dashboards
Pricing: Cerberus is open-source and free to use, making it accessible for individual developers and organizations seeking cost-effective telemetry solutions.
Figma for Claude Code
Inspector reimagines the design-to-code workflow by integrating visual editing directly with AI-powered code generation. Designed for developers, designers, and product teams, it allows users to click on UI elements within a design interface, make visual adjustments, and have those changes automatically reflected in the underlying codebase. The tool connects seamlessly with popular AI agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, streamlining the often tedious handoff process between design and development. Its unique approach eliminates the need for manual code edits or back-and-forth communication, enabling rapid prototyping and iteration. By bridging the gap between visual design and code, Inspector enhances productivity and fosters a more collaborative workflow, making it ideal for teams seeking to accelerate their development cycles with AI-powered precision.
Pros
- Intuitive visual interface for code adjustments
- Seamless integration with popular AI coding agents
- Reduces manual coding and design handoff time
- Supports rapid prototyping and iteration
- Streamlines collaboration between designers and developers
Cons
- May have limitations with complex UI components
- Dependent on AI accuracy, which can vary
- Learning curve for users unfamiliar with AI-assisted editing
Best for
- • Quick UI tweaks during product development
- • Design validation and iteration without extensive code changes
- • Bridging the gap between design and development teams
- • Rapid prototyping of new features
Pricing: Likely operates on a freemium model, offering basic features for free with paid plans providing additional integrations and advanced editing capabilities; exact pricing details are not publicly specified.